Jump to main content

Academic identity management

Impact

Academic impact refers to the influence and significance of scientific research results within the academic community. It is typically measured by bibliometric indicators such as citations, h-index or impact factor and describes the extent to which research work is used, cited and further developed by other researchers. In contrast to the broader definition of research impact, which also includes social, economic and cultural effects outside of academia, academic impact focuses primarily on recognition and dissemination within academia.

Academic impact is mainly measured using quantitative methods such as bibliometrics, the number of citations, integration into scientific discourse and visibility in specialist journals and databases. These key figures serve as the basis for research assessments, the allocation of funding and academic career decisions.

Bibliometric indicators

Standardised Journal Citation Metric (SCJM)

The Standardized Journal Citation Metric (SJCM) is a standardized citation metric used in the Academic Journal Guide (AJG) to make journals comparable across disciplines. It compensates for discipline-specific differences in citation behavior by dividing raw citation rates by the field average—similar to SNIP, but adapted specifically for AJG to ensure fair evaluations.

For more information, please visit:

https://charteredabs.org/
 

Calculation:

SCJM = (citations per paper in the journal) / (average citations per paper in the field)

Journal Impact Factor (JIF)

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF), also known as the Impact Factor, is a bibliometric indicator that measures the average citation frequency of articles in a scientific journal and thus evaluates its influence within a subject area. It is primarily used to compare journals with each other, not individual articles or authors, and is published annually by Clarivate Analytics in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). It is updated once a year and can only be accessed with a valid Web of Science license.

Advantages:

The JIF is standardized, transparent, and well-established, enabling quick comparisons within narrow subject categories and often correlating with a journal's visibility and prestige.

Disadvantages:

The JIF is not a measure of quality for individual articles, as citations are unevenly distributed (a few articles drive up the value) and discipline-specific differences are ignored (e.g., higher values in the life sciences). Criticisms include manipulation (e.g., maximizing reviews, minimizing editorials), self-citations, time delays, and discrimination against interdisciplinary or non-English-language journals.

Calculation:

(Citations in one year to publications published in the last two years) /

(Number of citable items in the last two years)

CiteScore

CiteScore is a metric provided by Elsevier based on information from its Scopus publication database. CiteScore calculates the average citation frequency per document in a journal. It is derived from the ratio of citations a journal receives in a given year (e.g., 2022) for publications from the previous four years (e.g., 2018–2021) to the total number of documents published during that period.

JIF Quartile

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) quartiles are a classification of scientific journals based on their impact factor within a subject category. They divide all journals in a discipline into four equal groups (quartiles) to show the relative position of a journal compared to its competitors. Quartiles provide a simple classification of whether a journal belongs to the leading, middle-tier, or lower-tier publications in a subject area.

Eigenfactor / Normalized Eigenfactor

The Eigenfactor Score is a bibliometric indicator used to evaluate the influence of scientific journals based on the frequency and significance of citations. Unlike the traditional Journal Impact Factor, the Eigenfactor weights citations according to the relevance of the citing source: citations from renowned and frequently cited journals count more than those from less influential titles.

The Eigenfactor Score reflects a journal's overall contribution to scientific discourse by taking into account both the volume (number of articles) and quality of citations. It is therefore useful for comparing journals of different sizes and publication frequencies.

Eigenfactor scores are less manipulable than the JIF because they take into account citation origin and network properties, giving greater weight to the influence of renowned journals.

Normalized Eigenfactor:

The normalized Eigenfactor, often referred to as the Article Influence Score (AIS), normalizes the Eigenfactor to the average impact per article. The total Eigenfactor is divided by the number of articles in the journal and normalized to a mean value of 1.0. An AIS greater than 1.0 means that the articles in this journal have an above-average impact, while an AIS less than 1.0 means that they have a below-average impact.

The normalized Eigenfactor therefore allows for better comparability of journals of different sizes or publication strategies and complements the Impact Factor, as it gives greater weight to citation quality.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) is a freely accessible bibliometric indicator for evaluating the scientific prestige of academic journals, which measures the average number of weighted citations per document. Citations are weighted differently depending on the source. The subject area, quality, and reputation of the journal have a direct influence on the value of a citation. Unlike most indicators, the SJR can also be applied to journals, book series, and conference proceedings.

Calculation:

(Average number of weighted citations per year) / (Number of documents published in the last three years)

Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)

The Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) is a normalized bibliometric indicator that measures how often publications (articles, books, conference papers) are cited compared to the global average for their field. It takes into account differences in discipline, publication type, and age to enable fair comparisons. The FWCI is not freely accessible.

Similar documents are those that come from the same subject area, are of the same type (e.g., article, letter, review), and are of the same age. An FWCI of 1 means that the publication performs exactly as expected compared to the global average. A value greater than 1 means that the publication is cited more often than would be expected based on the global average, and vice versa.

Calculation:
(Number of citations a document has received) / (Expected number of citations for similar documents)

Example:
A value of 1.48 means that the publication was cited 48% more often than expected.

Source Normalized Impact Per Paper (SNIP)

The Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) is a bibliometric indicator that measures the citation impact of scientific journals by normalizing discipline-specific differences in citation practices. Developed by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University and based on Scopus data from Elsevier, SNIP enables fair comparisons between journals in different subject areas, as citations from fields with low citation frequency are weighted more heavily. The impact of a single citation is greater in subject areas where citations are less frequent, and vice versa. Stability intervals provide information about the reliability of the evaluation. Smaller journals tend to have larger stability intervals than larger journals. SNIP is available free of charge.

Calculation:

(Number of citations per article in the journal) / (Citation potential in your subject area)

Additional Indicators
  • JIF Rank
  • JIF Percentile
  • Five-Year Journal Impact Factor
  • Five-Year Journal Impact Factor Quartile
  • JIF without Journal Self Citations
  • Immediacy Index
  • JCI (Journal Citation Indicator)
  • JCI Rank
  • JCI Quartile
  • JCI Percentile
  • Article Influence Score (AIS)
  • AIS Quantile
  • AIS Rank
  • Total Citations
  • Total Articles
  • Citable Items
  • % of Articles in Citable Items
  • Cited Half-Life
  • Citing Half-Life
Table overview
ScopeIndikatorExplanationEvaluationAvailability
School / PersonScholarly OutputNumber of publications in the publication list examinedAssessment in the context of the field and depending on academic age/career pathScopus, WoS, Google Scholar, specialist bibliographies, list of publications
School / PersonCitation CountTotal number of citations to the above publicationsAssessment in the context of the field and depending on academic age/career pathScopus, WoS, Google Scholar
PersonCitations per PublicationAverage number of citations per publicationEvaluation in the context of the field and depending on academic age/career path. Note any deviations from normal distribution.Scopus, WoS
PersonAuthor Impact FactorAverage number of citations in the last full year for publications published in the two previous yearsAssessment in the context of the subject area. Not applicable if no publications were made in the previous year and/or the year before that. Note any deviations from normal distribution.Scopus, WoS
Personh-indexNumber h of publications by a person that have been cited at least h timesAssessment in the context of the field and depending on academic age/career pathScopus, WoS, Google Scholar
 Anzahl Highly Cited PapersNumber of publications in the top 1% most cited publications in WoS (normalized, evaluation period 10 years)Extremely positive, if availableWoS
 Anzahl Hot PapersNumber of publications in the top 0.1% most cited publications in WoS (normalized, evaluation period 2 years)Extremely positive, if availableWoS
 Median Citation PercentileMedian of the normalized citation percentiles of the publications in the publication listThe higher, the more positiveWoS